SC to examine if farmers are evading satellite surveillance, Pg14

Key Highlights:

• The Supreme Court is examining whether farmers are timing stubble burning to evade satellite surveillance.
• Amicus curiae presented data suggesting farmers are aware of satellite timings.
• NASA scientist's analysis indicates stubble burning has not decreased.
• The court issued notice to Punjab and Haryana to submit reports on stubble-burning incidents.
• The court will hear the issue of upgrading anti-pollution restrictions on November 17.

Detailed Insights:

• The Supreme Court is concerned about the accuracy of data on stubble burning incidents.
• The amicus curiae suggested state administrations may be sharing satellite timings with farmers.
• In September, the court suggested criminal prosecution for errant farmers.
• The Centre prefers taking farmers along through policy rather than imprisonment.
• The court was urged to direct the CAQM to upgrade anti-pollution restrictions in Delhi-NCR to GRAP IV.
• GRAP IV measures involve a complete stop in construction and demolition activities.
• The AQI has already breached 400, prompting calls for proactive action from the CAQM.

Key Concepts Involved:

• Stubble Burning: The practice of setting fire to crop residue after harvest.
• Amicus Curiae: An impartial advisor to a court of law in a particular case.
• CAQM (Commission for Air Quality Management): Body responsible for air quality management in Delhi-NCR.
• GRAP (Graded Response Action Plan): A set of measures to combat air pollution based on AQI levels.