Fiscal federalism, efficiency versus equity concerns, Pg6
16th Finance Commission's recommendations prioritize efficiency over equity, raising concerns about widening regional disparities and federal balance in India.
The 16th Finance Commission (FC-16), chaired by Arvind Panagariya, submitted its report covering the period 2026-31.
It retained the vertical devolution of central taxes to states at 41%.
The Commission fundamentally re-engineered the structure of fiscal transfers, particularly grants-in-aid.
FC-16 recommended grants-in-aid totaling ₹9.47 lakh crore, a reduction from ₹10.1 lakh crore under the 15th Finance Commission, with their share in total transfers more than halving.
It eliminated Revenue Deficit Grants (RDGs), sector-specific, and state-specific grants, restricting grants-in-aid to local bodies and disaster management.
Detailed Insights:
The Finance Commission is a constitutional body established under Article 280 to mediate fiscal asymmetry between the Union and States.
Grants-in-aid, provided under Article 275, were conceived as instruments of equalisation to support states with special needs where formula-based tax devolution falls short.
The FC-16's approach marks a shift from need-based equalisation to compliance-based incentivisation, prioritizing efficiency and performance over equity.
The Commission's decision to remove RDGs is based on concerns about moral hazard, assuming states should manage finances without gap-filling transfers.
This aggregate view, however, masks deep inter-state disparities, potentially disadvantaging fiscally stressed states.
The FC-16's stance on RDGs contrasts with its treatment of cesses and surcharges, which are not shared with states and contribute to vertical imbalance.
The report proposes a "grand bargain" for the Centre to gradually merge cesses into the divisible pool in exchange for states accepting a lower devolution share.
The horizontal devolution formula was also altered, reducing the weight for income distance and introducing a 10% weight for contribution to GDP.
This shift, combined with the removal of RDGs, could disproportionately affect disadvantaged states, including those in the North-East and West Bengal.
The FC-16 emphasizes fiscal discipline, recommending a cap on state fiscal deficit at 3% of GSDP and the discontinuation of off-budget borrowings.
Key Concepts Involved:
Finance Commission: A constitutional body under Article 280 that recommends the distribution of financial resources between the Union and State Governments.
Fiscal Federalism: The division of financial powers and responsibilities between different levels of government in a federal system.
Grants-in-aid: Financial assistance provided by the Union government to states, primarily under Article 275, to address revenue deficits or specific developmental needs.
Revenue Deficit Grants (RDGs): Grants provided to states to cover the gap between their revenue receipts and revenue expenditure after tax devolution.
Cesses and Surcharges: Additional taxes levied by the Union government for specific purposes or on higher income groups, which are not part of the divisible pool shared with states.