The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has directed central and state expert bodies to resume processing 'post facto' environmental clearance proposals.
This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling on July 29, 2026, in the Vanashakti vs Union of India case.
The Supreme Court quashed the 2021 Office Memorandum but allowed pending applications under the post-facto mechanism to be processed.
Projects that had already received 'post facto' approvals will remain valid, and the 2017 notification was upheld.
Detailed Insights:
'Post facto' environmental clearances are granted to projects that began work, expanded, or modernized without obtaining prior environmental approval.
The directive specifies that no new 'post facto' proposals will be accepted; only those pending, rejected, or returned will be processed.
The Supreme Court reiterated that the prior environmental clearance regime is mandatory unless legally amended.
The 2017 notification was initially introduced as a one-time, six-month amnesty for 'violations' under the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification, 2006.
The legal challenge against retrospective clearances involved a review petition by the Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Association of India (CREDAI).
The Supreme Court had previously quashed the entire mechanism in May 2025 before recalling that order and issuing its final ruling in July 2026.
Key Concepts Involved:
Post-facto Environmental Clearance: Approval granted for projects that commenced operations or expansion without obtaining mandatory prior environmental approval.
Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification, 2006: A statutory framework in India requiring prior environmental clearance for certain projects to assess their potential environmental impacts.
Office Memorandum: A formal communication issued by a government department or ministry, often detailing policy decisions or procedural instructions.