Question
GSHardPrelims 2024Economy

With reference to the rule/rules imposed by the Reserve Bank of India while treating foreign banks, consider the following statements:

  1. There is no minimum capital requirement for wholly owned banking subsidiaries in India.
  2. For wholly owned banking subsidiaries in India, at least 50% of the board members should be Indian nationals.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect: Under the RBI’s 2013 Scheme for Setting up of Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (WOS), a foreign bank must have a minimum paid-up voting equity capital of ₹500 crore (₹5 billion). The claim that there is "no minimum capital" is factually false.

Statement 2 is incorrect: This is the high-nuance part. The actual RBI rule states that not less than 50% of the directors should be Indian nationals/NRIs/PIOs. Because the statement in the question restricted the 50% requirement only to "Indian nationals," it excluded NRIs and PIOs, making the statement legally inaccurate. Furthermore, there is a separate sub-condition that at least one-third of the directors must be Indian nationals who are specifically resident in India.

Trusted by 2L aspirants

Practice UPSC Prelims PYQs Smarter

Practice Now
  • Track accuracy & weak areas
  • See past trends & repeated themes
Start Practicing Now

PYQs by Papers

Most repeated Topics from Economy in Last 5 years

Repeated Topics
Questions in Last 5 Years
Finance and Financial Markets27 (34%)
Money, Banking and Monetary Policy16 (20%)
Public Finance in India11 (14%)
Infrastructure and Investment Models in India9 (11%)
Services and Digital Economy9 (11%)

Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor

An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited