The given numbers 240, 321, 418, and 812 can be simplified as follows:
240 remains as 240
321 remain as 321
418=236
812=236
This simplifies our choices to 240 , 321, 236 , and 236. Since 240 is obviously larger than 236 , it cannot be the smallest. Additionally, because we cannot have two correct answers, we are left to consider 321 as the smallest option.
If further comparison were needed between 236 and 321, we could factorize them for an estimate without full calculation:
236 can be written as 2×235=2×(25)7=2×327
321=(33)7=277
From observation, 321 is smaller than 236 without detailed computation, as the exponential growth in the latter is more significant.