Subash is Secretary, PWD in the State Government. He is a senior officer, known for his competence, integrity and dedication to work. He enjoys the trust and confidence of the Minister in charge of PWD and Programme Implementation. As a part of his job profile, he is responsible for policy formulation, execution of projects relating to infrastructure initiatives in the State. Besides, he oversees the technical and administrative aspects relating to planning, designing and construction etc..
Subash's Minister is an important Minister in the state and significant growth in urban infrastructure development and road network has been registered during his tenure. He is very keen for launching of ambitious road construction project in the near future.
Subash is in regular touch with the Minister and is working various modalities of road construction project. Regular meetings, interactions and presentations are made by him to the Minister before a formal public announcement of the project is made by the Minister. Subash's only son Vikas is in real estate business. His son, from his own sources, is aware that a mega road project is on the anvil and announcement in this regard is expected anytime. He is very keen to know from his father the exact location of the upcoming project. He knows that there would be quantum jump in the prices of land in the vicinity. Buying land at this stage at cheaper prices would pay him rich dividends. He is pleading with him (his father) day in and day out to share him location of the proposed project. He assured him that he would handle the matter discreetly so it would not attract any adverse notice as he in the normal course, keeps on buying land as a part of his business. He feels pressurised because of constant pleadings by his son.
Another significant aspect of the matter pertained to the extra/undue interest in the above project by the Minister PWD. His nephew was also having big infrastructure project company. In fact, the Minister has also introduced his nephew to him and indicated to him to take care of his nephew's business interest in the forthcoming project. The Minister encouraged him to act fast in the matter as early announcement and execution of mega road project would enhance his status in the party and public life.
In the above backdrop, Subash is in a fix as to the future course of action.
(a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case.
(b) Critically examine the options available to Subash in the above situation?
(c) Which of the above would be most appropriate and why?
Subash is Secretary, PWD in the State Government. He is a senior officer, known for his competence, integrity and dedication to work. He enjoys the trust and confidence of the Minister in charge of PWD and Programme Implementation. As a part of his job profile, he is responsible for policy formulation, execution of projects relating to infrastructure initiatives in the State. Besides, he oversees the technical and administrative aspects relating to planning, designing and construction etc..
Subash's Minister is an important Minister in the state and significant growth in urban infrastructure development and road network has been registered during his tenure. He is very keen for launching of ambitious road construction project in the near future.
Subash is in regular touch with the Minister and is working various modalities of road construction project. Regular meetings, interactions and presentations are made by him to the Minister before a formal public announcement of the project is made by the Minister. Subash's only son Vikas is in real estate business. His son, from his own sources, is aware that a mega road project is on the anvil and announcement in this regard is expected anytime. He is very keen to know from his father the exact location of the upcoming project. He knows that there would be quantum jump in the prices of land in the vicinity. Buying land at this stage at cheaper prices would pay him rich dividends. He is pleading with him (his father) day in and day out to share him location of the proposed project. He assured him that he would handle the matter discreetly so it would not attract any adverse notice as he in the normal course, keeps on buying land as a part of his business. He feels pressurised because of constant pleadings by his son.
Another significant aspect of the matter pertained to the extra/undue interest in the above project by the Minister PWD. His nephew was also having big infrastructure project company. In fact, the Minister has also introduced his nephew to him and indicated to him to take care of his nephew's business interest in the forthcoming project. The Minister encouraged him to act fast in the matter as early announcement and execution of mega road project would enhance his status in the party and public life.
In the above backdrop, Subash is in a fix as to the future course of action.
(a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case.
(b) Critically examine the options available to Subash in the above situation?
(c) Which of the above would be most appropriate and why?
The case presents a complex web of conflicts of interest and abuse of public office where Subash faces pressure from both his son and Minister to compromise his integrity for personal gains.
This scenario reflects common challenges in public administration where family relationships and political pressures test an officer's commitment to ethical governance.
Stakeholders
Stakeholders in the case
(a) Ethical Issues Involved
- Misuse of confidential information for personal financial gain violating public trust.
- Conflict between professional duty and family loyalty creating moral dilemma.
- Political pressure compromising administrative independence and merit-based decisions.
- Insider trading equivalent in real estate using privileged government information.
- Nepotism and favoritism in project allocation undermining fair competition.
- Breach of official secrecy potentially leading to market manipulation.
- Violation of conduct rules governing civil servants' behavior and family business interests.
- Compromise of public interest for private benefits affecting equitable development.
(b) Options Available to Subash
Option 1: Share project details with son and favor Minister's nephew
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Maintains family harmony and political relations | Violates Article 14 (equality) and service conduct rules |
| Ensures Minister's continued support | Creates precedent for future corruption |
| Immediate financial benefits for family | Risk of CBI/vigilance investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act |
| Avoids confrontation with powerful stakeholders | Destroys professional reputation and integrity |
Option 2: Refuse both demands and maintain complete transparency
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Upholds constitutional values and service ethics | Potential family discord and strained relations |
| Maintains public trust and administrative integrity | Risk of transfer or sidelining by Minister |
| Sets positive example for subordinates | Loss of political patronage affecting career |
| Ensures fair competition in project allocation | Personal isolation in professional environment |
Option 3: Seek transfer or recuse from project involvement
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Avoids direct conflict while maintaining ethics | Appears as escapism from responsibility |
| Protects from potential legal complications | May not solve underlying systemic issues |
| Reduces immediate pressure from stakeholders | Could be seen as admission of inability to handle pressure |
(c) Most Appropriate Course of Action
Option 2 represents the most appropriate choice as it aligns with constitutional principles and civil service values. Subash should:
- Immediately decline sharing confidential information citing official secrecy obligations under conduct rules.
- Document all interactions with Minister regarding nephew's business interests for transparency.
- Implement transparent bidding process ensuring equal opportunity as per Article 14.
- Seek guidance from Chief Secretary or Chief Minister if political pressure intensifies.
- Invoke RTI compliance mechanisms to ensure project details are publicly available simultaneously.
- Reference successful examples like E. Sreedharan's approach in infrastructure projects where merit and transparency were maintained despite pressures.
This approach upholds dharma (righteous duty) over personal considerations, ensuring that public resources serve collective welfare rather than individual interests.
It should be noted that a public servant shall not be driven by fear or favor in decision rather by the ideals of Constitution (like Equality and Justice) and Code of Conduct.
Administrative integrity forms the backbone of democratic governance, and compromising it for temporary gains undermines the very foundation of public service. ""The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do.""
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
Start Now