Rajyasabha has been transformed from a ‘useless Stepney tire’ to the most useful supportive organ in the past few decades. Highlight the factors as well as areas in which this transformation could be visible.
Rajyasabha has been transformed from a ‘useless Stepney tire’ to the most useful supportive organ in the past few decades. Highlight the factors as well as areas in which this transformation could be visible.
Recent judicial developments show India and UK's legal systems both converging through shared reforms and diverging due to distinct constitutional frameworks and contemporary challenges.
Points of Convergence
Technological Modernization
- Digital Court Systems: India's e-Courts Project Phase III (2023-2027) mirrors UK's Courts and Tribunals Service digitization
- AI Integration: Both exploring artificial intelligence for case management - India's SUPACE project and UK's 2040 Digital Justice Vision
- Online Dispute Resolution: Virtual hearings normalized post-COVID in both nations
- Data Analytics: Case tracking through India's National Judicial Data Grid and UK's HMCTS digital platform
- Access Enhancement: Mobile apps and digital filing systems improving citizen access
Judicial Independence Measures
- Security of Tenure: Both protect judges from arbitrary removal through established procedures
- Financial Autonomy: Separate judicial budgets to ensure independence from executive interference
- Administrative Independence: Courts managing their own administration and staff
- Contempt Powers: Similar authority to punish contempt and maintain court dignity
- International Cooperation: Joint initiatives on cross-border legal issues and extradition
Points of Divergence
| Aspect | India | United Kingdom |
|---|---|---|
| Appointment System | Collegium System (CJI + 4 senior judges) | Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) |
| Case Pendency | 51 million pending cases (2024) | 75,000 Crown Court cases (2024) |
| Constitutional Framework | Written Constitution with explicit judicial provisions | Unwritten constitution based on conventions |
| Appeal Structure | Three-tier unified system (District-High-Supreme) | Separate systems for England/Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland |
| Judicial Review Scope | Extensive powers including constitutional amendments | Limited by Parliamentary sovereignty |
- Jurisdictional Unity: India maintains unified judicial system; UK has separate legal systems for constituent nations
- Constitutional Interpretation: India's Supreme Court as final constitutional arbiter vs UK's Parliamentary supremacy principle
- Case Load Management: India struggles with massive pendency; UK focuses on efficiency optimization
- Language Barriers: India deals with multilingual proceedings; UK operates primarily in English
- Resource Allocation: India's judicial infrastructure challenges vs UK's established court facilities
Both systems continue evolving - India through National Mission for Justice Delivery and UK via Courts Reform Programme, demonstrating adaptive governance in modern democracies.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
