LiveUPSC Prelims 2026 Answer Key is LIVEView Now

The north-eastern region of India has been infested with insurgency for a very long time. Analyse the major reasons for the survival of armed insurgency in this region

GS 3
Internal Security
2017
10 Marks

India's northeastern region faces persistent armed insurgency despite decades of counter-insurgency operations, with Manipur alone accounting for 77.5% (248) of 320 insurgent attacks between January 2023-March 2024.

Historical and Identity-Based Factors

Ethnic and Cultural Grievances:

  • Tribal identity preservation concerns amid demographic changes and mainland cultural influence
  • Language protection movements resisting Hindi imposition and demanding constitutional recognition
  • Religious conversion tensions between Christian majority and Hindu minority communities
  • Cross-border ethnic linkages with Myanmar's Kuki and Chin communities facilitating insurgent networks
  • Fear of indigenous land rights erosion due to non-tribal settlement

Political Marginalization:

  • Historical "Chicken's Neck" isolation creating psychological distance from mainland India
  • Inadequate political representation in national decision-making processes
  • State reorganization demands from groups like Nagas seeking Greater Nagalim
  • Administrative neglect during British colonial period continuing post-independence

Geographical and External Enablers

Terrain Advantages:

  • Dense forest cover (78% in Arunachal Pradesh) providing natural hideouts
  • Difficult mountainous terrain hampering security force operations
  • 1,643 km porous Myanmar border enabling easy cross-border movement
  • Strategic location sharing boundaries with China, Bangladesh, and Bhutan
FactorImpact on Insurgency
Border PorosityIllegal arms trafficking, safe havens
Forest CoverNatural hideouts, training camps
International SupportCross-border terrorist linkages
Weak InfrastructureLimited security force mobility

External Support Networks:

  • Arms procurement from Myanmar and Bangladesh-based groups
  • Training facilities in Myanmar's Sagaing region for Indian insurgent groups
  • Drug trafficking through Golden Triangle route funding insurgent activities
  • Support from Pakistan's ISI through Bangladesh-based intermediaries

Socio-Economic Sustaining Factors

Development Deficit:

  • Poor connectivity with only 2% of India's railway network in northeast
  • Low industrialization with manufacturing contributing less than 5% to regional GDP
  • Youth unemployment exceeding 20% in states like Manipur and Tripura
  • Underutilized natural resources despite rich mineral and hydrocarbon reserves

(SK Map: Northeast India showing insurgency-affected areas and international borders)

Governance Challenges:

  • AFSPA implementation creating human rights concerns and local alienation
  • Corruption in development schemes reducing government credibility
  • Inadequate intelligence coordination among security agencies
  • Weak civil administration in remote border areas

The survival of insurgency requires addressing core issues through dialogue processes like Naga peace talks, implementing Act East Policy for connectivity, and ensuring equitable development under schemes like NESIDS. Success in Mizoram's peaceful transition demonstrates that comprehensive approaches combining security, development, and political accommodation can resolve long-standing conflicts.

Answer Length

Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.

In just 60 sec

Evaluate your handwritten answer

  • Get detailed feedback
  • Model Answer after evaluation
Evaluate Now

Model Answers by Papers

Year-Wise Model Answer

Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor

An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited