Starting from inventing the ‘basic structure’ doctrine, the judiciary has played a highly proactive role in ensuring that India develops into a thriving democracy. In light of the statement, evaluate the role played by judicial activism in achieving the ideals of democracy.
Starting from inventing the ‘basic structure’ doctrine, the judiciary has played a highly proactive role in ensuring that India develops into a thriving democracy. In light of the statement, evaluate the role played by judicial activism in achieving the ideals of democracy.
The Basic Structure Doctrine established in Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) transformed India's judiciary into a proactive guardian of democratic values. This judicial evolution has significantly shaped India's democratic trajectory through strategic interventions.
Role of Basic Structure Doctrine in Democracy
- Constitutional Safeguarding: Prevents amendments that could undermine democracy's core elements like separation of powers, judicial independence, and federalism
- Democratic Preservation: Recent 42nd Amendment challenges demonstrated judiciary's role in protecting democratic institutions from authoritarian tendencies
- Adaptive Interpretation: Courts have evolved constitutional meanings to address contemporary challenges while maintaining democratic essence
- Checks and Balances: Ensures no single institution can dominate others, maintaining democratic equilibrium
- Rights Protection: Strengthened fundamental rights framework against legislative and executive overreach
Achievements Through Judicial Activism
- Electoral Reforms: NOTA introduction (2013) and criminalisation in politics guidelines enhanced democratic participation and transparency
- Social Justice: Navtej Singh Johar case (2018) decriminalized homosexuality, expanding democratic inclusivity
- Environmental Democracy: M.C. Mehta cases established citizen's right to clean environment, broadening democratic rights
- Right to Information: Judicial support strengthened RTI Act implementation, promoting transparent governance
- Digital Rights: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy case (2017) established privacy as fundamental right in digital age
Challenges and Limitations
| Aspect | Issues | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Separation of Powers | Judicial overreach in policy matters | Blurred institutional boundaries |
| Democratic Accountability | Unelected judges making policy decisions | Questions on democratic legitimacy |
| Pendency Crisis | 4.7 crore pending cases (2024) | Delayed justice affecting democracy |
| Appointment Transparency | Collegium system opacity | Concerns about judicial independence |
Contemporary Relevance (2023-2025)
- Electoral Bond Judgment (2024): Supreme Court struck down electoral bonds scheme, ensuring transparency in political funding
- Same-Sex Marriage Cases (2023): Courts balanced social progress with legislative prerogative
- Article 370 Validation: Judiciary's role in constitutional interpretation during major political changes
- COVID-19 Response: Active judicial oversight of government policies during pandemic management
The judiciary's proactive stance has undeniably strengthened Indian democracy by protecting constitutional values and expanding rights. However, maintaining the delicate balance between judicial activism and democratic accountability remains crucial for India's democratic future, requiring continuous institutional refinement and collaborative governance among all three pillars of democracy.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
