Administrative Relations: Centre and the States

"The strength of a nation lies in the balance of power between its Centre and its States." 

In India’s federal structure, administrative relations between the Centre and State ensure smooth governance while maintaining unity in diversity. These provisions define the Centre’s authority, the States’ obligations, and the mechanisms of cooperation and coordination between the two.

Questions on Centre-State administrative relations frequently appear in the Indian Polity and Governance sections of both Prelims and Mains. Moreover, understanding this topic equips future bureaucrats with the foresight to make better policies on India’s governance. In this blog, we will delve into the constitutional provisions, conflicts, cooperative mechanisms, financial relations, and evolving trends of Centre-State administrative relations. 

Center-state relations form the foundation of India’s federal structure, ensuring a balance between national unity and regional autonomy. Federalism in India is designed to accommodate the diversity of languages, cultures, and administrative needs while maintaining the sovereignty of a unified nation. However, unlike the classical federal model in countries like the United States, the Indian Constitution establishes a quasi-federal structure—where the Centre holds a dominant position while ensuring autonomy for the States. Effective centre-State relations helps in:

• Ensuring Effective Governance
• Strengthening Cooperative Federalism
• Economic & Financial Stability
• Managing Political and Regional Stability

The concept of Centre-State relations is broadly classified into three dimensions:

1. Legislative Relations: Division of law-making powers between the Centre and the States.
2. Administrative Relations: Distribution of responsibilities for policy implementation and governance.
3. Financial Relations: Allocation of financial resources and taxation powers between different levels of government.

Now, let’s examine centre state administrative relations in detail. 

The administrative relations between Centre and State are primarily governed by Articles 256 to 263 of the Indian Constitution. It defines the Centre’s authority, the States' responsibilities, and the role of the judiciary in resolving disputes.

1. Governance Under Articles 256 to 263

The Constitution of India, through Articles 256 to 263, lays down a structured framework governing Centre-State administrative relations:

Article 256 – Obligation of States and the Executive Power of the Union

• Mandates that State governments must comply with the laws made by Parliament and ensure their proper execution.
• Empowers the Centre to issue directives to the States to enforce laws effectively.

Article 257 – Control of the Union Over States in Certain Cases

• The State governments must not impede or prejudice the executive power of the Union.
• The Centre can direct States in matters related to railways, industries, and communication, ensuring national interests are upheld.

Article 258 – Delegation of Union Powers to States

• Allows the Centre to delegate certain executive powers to State governments, enabling decentralization while maintaining control.

Article 263 – Inter-State Council for Coordination

• Provides for the establishment of an Inter-State Council to facilitate coordination and dispute resolution between the Centre and States.
• The President of India has the power to constitute this council for effective policy implementation and intergovernmental cooperation.

2. Quasi-Federalism and Cooperative Federalism Under the Constitution

India’s governance model is often described as "quasi-federal," meaning it exhibits both federal and unitary characteristics. The Centre holds significant control over administrative matters, yet cooperative mechanisms exist to balance power distribution.

Quasi-Federalism: Strong Central Control

• The Centre retains greater administrative control, especially in matters related to national security, economic planning, and inter-state coordination.
• The Union government can override State authority in certain areas, ensuring uniform governance.
• Emergency provisions (Articles 352, 356, and 360) allow the Centre to take complete administrative control in exceptional circumstances.

Cooperative Federalism: Centre-State Collaboration

• India has evolved a model of cooperative federalism, where the Centre and States work together on issues like disaster management, welfare schemes, health, and education policies.
• Institutions such as the NITI Aayog, GST Council, and Zonal Councils promote collaboration between different levels of government.
• The Inter-State Council under Article 263 plays a key role in harmonizing policies across States.

3. Role of Judiciary in Centre-State Administrative Relations

The Supreme Court and High Courts act as arbiters in disputes between the Centre and States, interpreting constitutional provisions to maintain balance in administrative relations.

Judicial Review of Centre-State Disputes

• The Supreme Court has played a vital role in interpreting the scope of Articles 256-263, ensuring that both the Centre and States function within their constitutional limits.
• Cases like S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) clarified the misuse of Article 356 (President’s Rule) and upheld the federal structure.

Limiting Central Overreach

• Courts have ruled that while the Centre has the authority to issue directives to States, it cannot override their constitutional autonomy arbitrarily.
• In State of West Bengal v. Union of India (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that Parliament cannot unilaterally take over State functions without constitutional amendments.

Strengthening Cooperative Governance

• Judicial interventions have emphasized the need for collaborative governance, where both the Centre and States work together rather than in a hierarchical manner.
• The Supreme Court has often urged the Centre to respect State autonomy while ensuring national unity.

Also watch: Complete Preamble in 10 minutes | Polity | UPSC CSE 

The executive power of the Centre extends across the country, allowing it to function as the primary authority in several key areas: 

Executive Power Over Union Subjects

• Under Article 246(1), Parliament holds exclusive power to make laws on subjects in the Union List (List I).
• The Union government’s executive authority extends to all matters in this list, including:
• Defense and national security
• Foreign affairs and diplomacy
• Atomic energy and space research
• Currency, banking, and finance
• Interstate trade and commerce

Power to Issue Directives to States (Articles 256 & 257)

• The Centre has the authority to direct State governments to comply with Union laws.
• Article 256: States are obligated to implement laws enacted by Parliament.
• Article 257: States must ensure their actions do not hinder national policies or executive functions.

Emergency Powers – Central Takeover of State Administration

The Centre’s executive dominance is most evident during emergencies:

• Article 352 (National Emergency): The Union government assumes full control, extending executive authority over States.
• Article 356 (President’s Rule): The State government is suspended, and the Centre governs directly.
• Article 360 (Financial Emergency): The Centre can reduce State expenditures and direct State policies.

While the States enjoy significant autonomy in their sphere, their executive powers come with constitutional limitations.

Executive Power Over State Subjects

Under Article 246(3), States have exclusive control over List II (State List) subjects, including:

• Police and public order
• Agriculture and irrigation
• Health, sanitation, and hospitals
• Land revenue and local governance
• State transport and trade

The Governor acts as the constitutional head of the State, while the Chief Minister and Council of Ministers exercise actual executive power. Despite their autonomy, States must function within the framework defined by the Constitution:

• Though non-justiciable, DPSPs (Part IV of the Constitution) direct States in governance, including social welfare, economic justice, and environmental protection.
• Under Article 251 and Article 254, if a State law conflicts with a Union law on a Concurrent List subject, the Union law prevails.
• The Union government can delegate administrative functions to States, but States cannot impose conditions on such delegation.

Confused about any key terms or definitions in Polity? Just ask it and SuperKalam AI will explain it in the simplest words. You can even try different prompts to make it more customized for yourself.

Must read: India's Electoral System: Evolution, Challenges, and the Path to Reform | UPSC Current Affairs

The legislative and executive powers of the Centre and States are divided into three lists under Schedule VII of the Constitution:

Union List (List I) – 100 Subjects

• Subjects under the exclusive control of the Centre.
• Includes defense, foreign policy, atomic energy, banking, and railways.
• Parliament’s authority is absolute on these matters, and States cannot interfere.

State List (List II) – 61 Subjects

• Areas where States have full legislative and executive control.
• Includes law and order, agriculture, public health, irrigation, and local governance.
• However, under certain conditions (Articles 249 & 250), the Parliament can legislate on State List subjects.

Concurrent List (List III) – 52 Subjects

• Shared responsibilities between the Centre and States.
• Includes education, forests, criminal law, marriage laws, and labor regulations.
• Article 254(1): If there is a conflict between Union and State laws, the Union law prevails.

Residuary Powers – Article 248

• Matters not listed in any of the three lists fall under the Centre’s jurisdiction (e.g., cyber laws, space research).

This division of powers ensures that both the Centre and States have well-defined areas of governance, though the Centre retains greater control in matters of national importance.

Must watch: Article 370 - What to know for UPSC 2024? | Learn with MindMap Expert - Arpita Sharma

To enhance Centre-State administrative relations, various committees, judicial pronouncements, and governance experts have suggested key reforms aimed at promoting cooperative federalism, reducing conflicts, and ensuring smooth governance. These recommendations are highly relevant for UPSC aspirants, particularly in GS Paper II (Indian Polity and Governance) and Essay Paper.

1. Strengthening Cooperative Federalism

One of the primary issues in Centre-State administrative relations is the dominance of the Centre over the States. To create a more balanced structure:

Greater Autonomy for States

• The Centre should avoid unnecessary intervention in State subjects, allowing States to function independently within their domain.
• Example: Reducing the frequent misuse of Article 356 (President’s Rule).

Reviving the Inter-State Council (Article 263)

• Strengthen the Inter-State Council (ISC) as a permanent, active body to resolve disputes and promote collaborative decision-making.
• Regular meetings should be held to discuss national policies affecting States.

Decentralization and Empowering Local Governments

• Strengthening Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) as the third tier of governance.
• Proper implementation of 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments.

Also cover: Lok Sabha passes 3 Criminal Law Amendment Bills | IPC, CrPC & Indian Evidence Act | UPSC CSE

2. Reducing Central Overreach with Balanced Executive Powers

Reforming Articles 256 & 257 (Centre’s Power to Issue Directives to States)

• These Articles should be exercised only in exceptional cases to prevent excessive interference in State administration.

Clearer Delimitation of Union and State Subjects

• Review and update Schedule VII (Union, State, and Concurrent Lists) to address modern governance challenges.
• Example: Emerging fields like cybersecurity, climate change, and data protection need clearer jurisdiction.

Restructuring All-India Services (IAS, IPS, IFS)

• Allowing greater say for States in appointment and cadre allocation.
• Ensuring more flexibility in officer postings to balance the Centre’s control and State autonomy.

3. Strengthening Fiscal Federalism 

Empowering States with Greater Financial Control

• More untied funds should be allocated to States under Finance Commission recommendations.
• Increasing States' share in tax revenues to reduce dependency on the Centre.

GST Reform for States’ Benefit

• Strengthening GST Council’s dispute resolution mechanism to address State concerns on revenue sharing.
• Ensuring timely compensation for revenue losses, especially for financially weaker States.

Reducing the Discretionary Use of Grants

• The Centre should minimize conditional grants and instead allow States more autonomy in fund utilization.

4. Strengthening Judicial Mechanisms for Resolving Centre-State Disputes

Expediting Dispute Resolution by the Supreme Court

• Many Centre-State disputes (e.g., river water disputes, taxation issues) remain pending for years.
• A fast-track mechanism for constitutional and inter-state disputes is necessary.

Stronger Role of Tribunals and Dispute Resolution Bodies

• Strengthening existing bodies like the Inter-State River Water Disputes Tribunal for faster and more binding resolutions.
• Promoting alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to reduce adversarial legal battles between the Centre and States.

5. Reforming Governor’s Role to Ensure Neutrality

The Governor’s role has been a contentious issue in Centre-State relations, often seen as an agent of the Centre rather than a neutral constitutional head.

• The Sarkaria Commission (1988) recommended that Governors should act independently and impartially, rather than following political instructions from the Centre.
• Governor’s reports for imposing the President’s Rule should be objective, transparent, and judicially reviewable.
• Appointing eminent persons with no active political affiliations as Governors.
• Implementing a fixed tenure to prevent arbitrary removals.

Master COMPLETE Fundamental Rights in 1 Video| UPSC Prelims| Indian Polity | SuperKalam

Share your handwritten Mains answers with SuperKalam, receive detailed feedback, and model answers in seconds. Discuss your answers LIVE with expert mentors – all for FREE!

To master directive words for UPSC Mains, read: Understanding Directive Words in the UPSC Mains Exam.

To ensure a harmonious and effective federal structure, India must adopt reforms that balance the executive powers of the Centre and the States. Understanding these recommendations helps aspirants critically analyze India’s evolving federal structure and administrative relations.

Don't miss out on the most repeated Polity questions in UPSC! Watch now to master the most important topics, decode PYQ trends, and boost your Prelims preparation. 

Take your UPSC Preparation to the Next Level with SuperKalam!

Meet SuperKalam! Your Super Mentor provides a comprehensive learning ecosystem, you can benefit from focused and disciplined preparation strategies. 

Start Now—it's FREE and take advantage of personalized guidance to crack the UPSC with confidence and clarity.

Explore SuperKalam's Resources and set yourself on the path to success!