Practice MCQs
The post of Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha has remained vacant since 2019, breaching constitutional principles and democratic conventions.
The Deputy Speaker plays a key role in maintaining continuity of legislative work, not merely substituting for the Speaker.
Article 93 mandates the election of both Speaker and Deputy Speaker "as soon as may be" — signaling urgency.
Article 94 and Article 180 emphasize the continuity and constitutional duties of the Deputy Speaker in case of Speaker's absence or resignation.
Violation of Articles 93, 94 & 180: Long-term vacancy is inconsistent with the constitutional framework and parliamentary rules (Rule 8 of Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure, 1952).
Erosion of Checks and Balances: Absence of a Deputy Speaker centralises authority in the Speaker, who belongs to the ruling party, undermining neutrality and the opposition’s role in legislative oversight.
Constitutional Conventions Matter: In the Westminster model (followed by India), offering the Deputy Speaker’s role to the Opposition is a crucial democratic practice — aimed at inclusive governance and bipartisan dialogue.
Democratic Fatigue: Not appointing a Deputy Speaker signals institutional apathy and threatens democratic resilience in the long run.
Assumes full powers of the Speaker when the Speaker is absent.
Acts as a neutral arbiter in sensitive and contested discussions.
Maintains legislative momentum and institutional balance in the functioning of the House.
Mains Mock Question:
Critically examine the constitutional and democratic implications of the prolonged vacancy of the Deputy Speaker's post in the Lok Sabha. Suggest measures to institutionalise this appointment process.