A Delhi court discharged Arvind Kejriwal and 22 others in the CBI's excise policy case, citing lack of evidence.
The court criticized the CBI's investigation as a "conscious abuse of official position" and recommended departmental proceedings against the Investigating Officer.
The court found no evidence of manipulation in policy formulation or corruption in implementation of the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22.
The CBI's bribery allegations of a Rs 100-crore bribe were dismissed as speculative and lacking admissible evidence.
Detailed Insights:
The court found that the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 was the outcome of a consultative and deliberative exercise, contradicting the prosecution's claim of manipulation.
The court noted inconsistencies in statements of approvers and lack of corroboration, undermining the CBI's claims of conspiracy and bribery.
The court deemed "pauti" entries from Angadia firms inadmissible as evidence, as they were not part of regularly maintained books of account.
The ruling is a boost for the Aam Aadmi Party, whose leaders were accused in the excise policy case, and may impact the ED's money-laundering probe linked to the same issue.
The Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 aimed to increase excise revenue, standardize distribution, and curb illegal liquor sales by shifting to a fully privatized model.
Key Concepts Involved:
Approver: A person involved in a crime who testifies against their accomplices in exchange for leniency.
Hawala: An informal system of transferring money without physical movement, based on trust and a network of brokers.
Predicate Offence: A crime that is a component of a more serious crime, such as money laundering.