PM Modi at the 10th NITI Aayog Governing Council Meeting urged states to work as “Team India,” but the editorial critiques the asymmetry in Centre-State fiscal relations.
- GST Council and NITI Aayog meetings are infrequent; the former has not met for over five months, despite mandatory quarterly meetings.
- Tamil Nadu CM M.K. Stalin proposed raising the States’ share in central taxes to 50%, from the current 41%.
- GST has subsumed many state-level indirect taxes, and despite modest recovery in State tax performance, pre-GST levels were only recently surpassed.
- States' own tax revenue as a share of GSDP rose from 6.6% (2017-18) to 7.2% (2024-25), but compensation for GST shortfalls has ended.
Detailed Insights:
- Structural Imbalance:
- While GST was expected to enhance overall revenues, many states have seen reduced fiscal autonomy, with dependence on compensation from the Centre.
- The one-way structure of fiscal federalism undermines cooperative federalism ideals.
- Forum Frequency Criticism:
- NITI Aayog and GST Council are key federal dialogue platforms, but infrequent meetings reduce policy responsiveness.
- States often voice individual issues when they get a chance, reflecting the lack of institutional collaboration.
- Sub-Groups for Federal Collaboration:
- Proposal by AP CM N. Chandrababu Naidu to form three sub-groups of states—on GDP growth, leveraging demographics, and tech-driven governance.
- Seen as a means to streamline regional input and foster innovation in Centre-State cooperation.
- Need for Reconsideration of Tax Share:
- Stalin’s call for increasing the vertical devolution is rooted in the erosion of state revenue capacity post-GST.
- Fairness argument: Since GST curtailed state taxing powers, enhancing their share of centrally collected taxes is justified.
Mains Mock Question:
In light of the GST regime and the decline in state-level fiscal autonomy, critically evaluate the demand for increasing the states’ share in central taxes. How can cooperative federalism be revitalized in India?