The Supreme Court prohibited fresh mining leases in the Aravalli region on November 20, pending a Management Plan for Sustainable Mining (MPSM).
Rampant mining, quarrying, and deforestation have led to groundwater depletion, ecological damage, and worsened air quality in Delhi and Haryana.
The court acknowledged the conflict of interest for states in banning mining due to its revenue source, despite limited enforcement capacity.
An expert committee proposed considering only mountains 100 meters or higher as part of the Aravalli range, potentially excluding 92% of the hills.
Detailed Insights:
The court aims to balance environmental protection with the need for stone and minerals for India's developmental trajectory, avoiding a complete mining ban to prevent illegal mining.
The Aravalli Green Wall Project, promoted by the Centre, faces challenges as reforestation may not predictably compensate for deforestation's impact.
The definition of what constitutes the Aravallis is contested, with the court deferring to the Attorney Solicitor General's broader interpretation without clear reasoning.
Lack of transparency regarding the definition of the Aravallis and its implications creates a trust deficit for the government in environmental policy.
Key Concepts Involved:
Greenwashing: Presenting a false image of environmental responsibility.
Sustainable Mining: Mining practices that minimize environmental impact.
Deforestation: Clearing of forests for other land uses.