Practice MCQs
Policy Shift & Trigger
After the Pahalgam terror attack, India placed the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) “in abeyance” and is now weighing unprecedented steps.
Cites “sustained cross-border terrorism” as grounds to reassess obligations.
Proposed Measures Under Review
Withdrawing from ongoing talks to evolve a new dispute-resolution mechanism.
Redesigning Chenab, Jhelum and Indus hydro-projects to store larger volumes through draw-down flushing.
Halting periodic sharing of hydrological data with Pakistan.
Treaty Constraints & Practicalities
IWT currently bars significant storage on western rivers and mandates prescribed water levels to prevent flooding in Pakistan.
Permanent Indus Commission has not met since 2022; its dormancy impedes routine cooperation.
Any major design changes demand rigorous techno-economic feasibility studies given Himalayan terrain and costs.
Strategic & Diplomatic Implications
“Weaponising” Indus waters would mean a complete disregard of the treaty—seen by experts as legally and technically arduous.
Move signals pressure on Pakistan yet risks international scrutiny over treaty compliance and upper-riparian responsibility.
India’s exploration of tougher IWT options reflects a securitisation of water diplomacy amid persistent terrorism concerns.
While strategic leverage may deter hostile actions, Delhi must weigh international legal fallout, ecological impacts, and the long-term viability of Himalayan hydro-projects.
A calibrated approach—reviving the Commission, seeking third-party arbitration reforms, and enhancing storage within treaty allowances—could strengthen India’s bargaining position without undermining its image as a responsible upper-riparian state.
Mains Mock Question:
“Critically examine the strategic and legal dimensions of India’s recent move to place the Indus Waters Treaty ‘in abeyance’. How can India balance its security interests with international water-sharing obligations?”