Key Highlights
Judicial Probe and Transparency
- CJI Sanjiv Khanna initiated in-house inquiry into Justice Yashwant Varma’s alleged misconduct involving recovery of burnt currency notes.
- Inquiry led by Chief Justices from Delhi, Punjab, Himachal, and Karnataka HCs.
Steps Taken
- Judicial work allocation withdrawn from the judge.
- Transparency shown through public statements and documentation, indicating a shift towards openness.
Systemic Issues and Concerns
- Questions raised on probe mechanism’s adequacy.
- FIR cannot be registered against a judge without CJI’s permission—shows limits of police/judicial coordination.
- Fire Services' initial denial and retraction added to confusion.
Analysis & Way Forward
- While the judiciary showed welcome transparency, deeper institutional reforms are needed.
- Judicial accountability mechanisms must be independent yet fair, ensuring protection from misuse while upholding public trust.
Mains Mock Question:
Do you think current mechanisms for judicial accountability in India strike the right balance between transparency and independence? Discuss with recent examples.