SC directs Himachal govt. to be clear on its disaster management measures, Pg10

Key Highlights:

• The Supreme Court directed the Himachal Pradesh government to clarify its disaster management plans, climate change and tourism policies, constructions and industrialization measures.
• The directive was issued in a suo motu case addressing landslides and flash floods during the monsoon season.
• The court seeks details on hydroelectric projects, four-lane highways, and the number of trees felled.
• The next hearing is scheduled for October 28.

Detailed Insights:

• The Supreme Court referenced its observation that human actions, not nature alone, are responsible for landslides, building collapses, and road subsidence.
• The court's amicus curiae has prepared questions for the state government, including whether zoning is based on seismic activity, landslides, green cover, and eco-sensitivity.
• The court is seeking information on ecological sites that prohibit industrialization or mega projects.
• Details are requested regarding designated protected areas, reserved forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, and eco-sensitive sites, including whether eco-sensitive zones have been notified.
• The court seeks data on the total designated forest area in Himachal Pradesh and the amount diverted for non-forest use in the last two decades.

Key Concepts Involved:

• Suo Motu: An action taken by a court on its own without any prompting from the parties.
• Amicus Curiae: An impartial advisor, often an expert in law, appointed by a court to furnish information or advice on a matter of law.
• Eco-sensitive Zone: Areas around protected areas, national parks and wildlife sanctuaries where certain activities are regulated to minimize environmental impact.