Practice MCQs
The 72nd Miss World beauty pageant is scheduled to be held in Hyderabad in May 2025, sparking protest from women’s organisations.
Critics argue that beauty pageants reinforce capitalist and patriarchal values, reducing empowerment to appearance-centric metrics.
Supporters highlight how pageants offer visibility, aspiration, and opportunities to many young women.
The core issue lies in state sponsorship of such events over more urgent priorities like health, education, or innovation.
The debate is not about binaries of ‘for’ or ‘against’, but about rethinking empowerment, representation, and values.
Beauty pageants in India, since Bangalore 1996 and Mumbai 2024, have faced backlash for their focus on physical aesthetics and perceived commercialisation of women’s bodies.
The upcoming Miss World event, hosted under the tagline “Telangana Zaroor Aana”, is promoted as a tourism booster.
Women’s groups have questioned the public spending and symbolic messaging behind such international events.
The critique centers on how such spectacles distract from grassroots developmental needs and reinforce limited notions of female value.
Despite changes in format (e.g., “beauty with purpose”), critics say the core structure still promotes packaged femininity for consumption.
Events like Miss World reflect larger socio-political choices around state resource allocation and public messaging.
Raises questions about who defines empowerment, and what kinds of ambition and success are rewarded.
May fuel debates around gender representation in media, the role of government in cultural branding, and public-private sponsorship ethics.
Need to promote pluralistic definitions of empowerment, beyond glamor or visibility.
Encourage platforms that celebrate female agency, dignity, and lived experiences, not just performance.
Governments should prioritise investment in health, education, and entrepreneurship for women, ensuring deeper empowerment.
Create inclusive platforms for representation where women define the narrative, rather than conform to it.
Balancing freedom of choice for participants with critique of structural bias.
Ensuring that public events do not overshadow critical welfare priorities.
Moving the discourse from “beauty equals empowerment” to one rooted in equality, safety, and opportunity.
Avoiding tokenism while fostering genuine, transformative platforms for female expression.
Mains Mock Question:
“Beauty pageants are often projected as tools of empowerment, yet they are deeply embedded in structures of patriarchy and capitalism. Critically analyse the duality of representation and commodification in such global events, especially in the Indian context.”