Should the NEET-UG be decentralised?, Pg9

Key Highlights:

• The NEET-UG 2026 re-examination has highlighted flaws in India's testing system, sparking calls for decentralization.
• NEET, since 2013, faces controversies over paper leaks and administrative failures, affecting lakhs of aspirants.
• Experts suggest reforms like state autonomy in admissions and a two-stage exam to reduce pressure and corruption.
• The K. Radhakrishnan Committee's recommendations to improve NTA's capacity and security were largely ignored.

Detailed Insights:

• NEET's original goal of a transparent exam has been undermined by lapses, disadvantaging rural and poor students.
• A single-window exam increases pressure, while low qualifying marks enable wealthier students to secure management seats.
• Limiting attempts and offering extra chances for disadvantaged students could improve fairness in the NEET exam.
• Fee regulation under the National Medical Commission Act is limited, allowing private colleges to set high fees.
• Granting states autonomy in admissions and implementing a two-stage exam could reduce excessive competition.
• The K. Radhakrishnan Committee proposed a preliminary qualifier to filter candidates before the final exam.
• The re-examination has caused emotional and financial distress, eroding confidence in national competitive exams.

Key Concepts Involved:

• NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test): A national-level entrance exam for admission to medical courses in India.
• NTA (National Testing Agency): The agency responsible for conducting entrance exams like NEET in India.
• National Medical Commission Act: Legislation governing medical education and regulation of medical institutions in India.