Judiciary cannot tie President, Governor to timelines, says SC, Pg1

Key Highlights:

• The Supreme Court stated that the judiciary cannot impose fixed timelines on Governors and the President for disposing of State Bills.
• The court was answering the 16th Presidential Reference and emphasized that setting rigid timetables would undermine the separation of powers.
• Prolonged inaction on State Bills by the President and Governors was cautioned against by the court.
• The Supreme Court clarified that Governors have options under Article 200, including granting assent, reserving for presidential consideration, or returning the bill with comments.

Option Available with Governor.png

Detailed Insights:

• The Presidential Reference was triggered after a prior Supreme Court judgment on April 8 fixed a three-month deadline for disposing of pending State Bills.
• The court clarified that it can address general legal questions referred by the President, even if related to a prior judgment.
• The Supreme Court termed the President's set of 14 questions as a "functional reference" concerning the roles of state legislatures, Governors, and the President.
• The Governor must return a bill to the State Assembly with reasons for withholding assent, upholding the principles of federalism.
• While the court cannot review the merits of a Governor's decision under Article 200, it can issue a mandamus for timely action in cases of prolonged inaction.
• Governors have personal immunity from court proceedings under Article 361 of the Constitution.
• The President is not obligated to consult the Supreme Court on every State Bill referred by Governors.
• Courts cannot adjudicate the contents of a bill before it becomes law, respecting the legislative process.

Key Concepts Involved:

• Presidential Reference: Advice sought by the President from the Supreme Court on a question of law or fact under Article 143.
• Article 200: Constitutional provision outlining the Governor's powers regarding assent to bills passed by the State Legislature.
• Separation of Powers: Doctrine distributing distinct powers to the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary to prevent abuse of authority.