Practice MCQs
PM Modi declared India will pursue and punish every terrorist and their backers, signaling a firm shift in India’s counterterrorism doctrine.
The article analyzes India’s evolving doctrine of response post-Pulwama (2019) and Uri (2016) attacks.
India’s responses (like surgical strikes and Balakot airstrike) are part of what is now termed a ‘new normal’ — calibrated, retaliatory, and focused.
Pakistan’s retaliation and India’s subsequent measured counter-response mark a shift from previous restraint.
Operation Sindoor is highlighted as part of this broader strategic evolution.
Detailed Insights:
India is no longer deterred by fears of nuclear escalation or international pressure; it retaliates with precision and clarity.
Post-Balakot, India clarified it will strike terror camps and proxies, not civilian or military institutions unless provoked.
The article critiques Pakistan’s dual stance — denying support to terror groups publicly but hosting or ignoring them in PoK.
A firm stance is projected: No Pakistani soil used for terrorism will be spared; India’s deterrence now includes clear and immediate retaliation.
Diplomatic messaging in English is targeted not just at Pakistan but also at global capitals to communicate India’s unwavering resolve.
Key Concepts:
‘New Normal’ Doctrine: India’s strategic policy of proportionate and visible retaliation to terrorist provocations from Pakistan.
Surgical Strike/Balakot Doctrine: Targeted, cross-border military actions on terror infrastructure, avoiding wider war.
Deterrence Credibility: India’s calibrated response aims to maintain peace while making retaliatory costs high for Pakistan.
Significance:
Reflects India’s strategic maturity — no longer bound by passivity or international timidity.
Aims to change the cost-benefit calculus for Pakistan’s support to terrorism.
Strengthens India's global image as a responsible but assertive power that respects international norms while defending its sovereignty.
Mains Mock Question:
Discuss India’s evolving response to cross-border terrorism in the light of the “new normal” doctrine. How does this reflect a shift in India’s strategic culture and global diplomacy?