Legal Challenge Over Worship Rights in Similipal Tiger Reserve (STR)
- Munda tribal member, Nandi Ho, moved Orissa HC after being denied permission for customary worship inside Similipal Tiger Reserve (STR).
- Challenge against Tiger Supplementation Programme, citing that it ignored local consent.
Tiger Conservation vs. Tribal Rights
- Zeenat, a tigress from Tadoba-Andhari Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra, translocated to STR for genetic diversity enhancement.
- Jamunagarh villagers traditionally worshipped inside STR but were denied access after the translocation.
- Legal plea argues violation of Forest Rights Act, 2006, which guarantees tribal communities' rights to practice religious traditions in sacred groves.
Petitioners' Arguments
- Translocation was conducted without consulting local people, violating protocols & tribal rights.
- Authorities arbitrarily denied worship rights despite earlier informal permissions.
Analysis & Way Forward
- Balancing tiger conservation with indigenous rights is crucial.
- Forest Rights Act, 2006, ensures tribal participation in conservation decisions.
- Authorities must establish participatory mechanisms that allow conservation while respecting customary religious practices.
- Court’s decision could set a precedent for tribal rights in protected areas.
Mains Mock Question:
"Discuss the conflict between wildlife conservation and tribal rights in protected areas. Suggest a balanced approach to ensure both biodiversity conservation and indigenous rights."