The Supreme Court quashed 5 FIRs against Rajendra Bihari Lal, Vice-Chancellor of SHUATS, and others, related to alleged religious conversions to Christianity.
The court emphasized that criminal law should not be used to harass innocent individuals based on unsubstantiated claims.
The FIRs were registered under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.
The court referenced its 1977 judgment in Rev. Stanislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors, clarifying that the right to propagate religion does not extend to conversions by force or fraud.
A sixth FIR involving charges of attempted murder and extortion was separated for further consideration.
Detailed Insights:
The court highlighted that allowing strangers or unrelated third parties to initiate criminal proceedings would intrude upon individual freedom and open the door to frivolous litigation, diluting constitutional guarantees.
The judgment underscores the importance of protecting individual autonomy, dignity, and liberty from unwarranted intrusion under the guise of protecting religious freedom.
The court cited the Arnab Goswami case, reiterating that multiple FIRs regarding the same offense or incident are an abuse of the investigative process, except in specific circumstances.
The Supreme Court affirmed its role as the ultimate guarantor of fundamental rights under Part III of the Constitution, ensuring remedies against their violation.
The interim protection granted to the accused in the sixth FIR will continue until the matter is fully heard and decided.
Key Concepts Involved:
Fundamental Rights: Basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India to all citizens.
Freedom of Religion: The right to practice, profess, and propagate any religion, subject to public order, morality, and health.
FIR (First Information Report): A written document prepared by police when they receive information about the commission of a cognizable offense.