Key Highlights
1. SC Records Centre’s Statement
- Centre assured SC that no Waqf properties (including Waqf-by-user) will be de-notified or altered until the next court hearing.
- No appointments to Central Waqf Council or State Boards will be made until then.
2. Legal Contention
- Issue relates to Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025, especially amendments to Sections 9 and 14 of Waqf Act 1995.
- Controversy over inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf administration and removal of Waqf-by-user category.
Detailed Insights
1. Supreme Court’s Observations
- CJI Sanjiv Khanna acknowledged “certain positives” in the amendment.
- Warned against drastic change affecting land ownership and people’s rights.
- Emphasized need to maintain status quo to avoid irreversible consequences.
2. Solicitor General’s Position
- Tushar Mehta emphasized that de-notification at this stage would be a “serious and harsh step”.
- Sought time to submit detailed legislative history and justification over 100 years of Waqf law evolution.
Significance
- Reinforces judicial oversight in safeguarding minority rights and property entitlements.
- Highlights delicate balance between reforming religious trusts and protecting historical usage of land and property.
- Reflects broader tension between communal inclusivity and minority autonomy in trust governance.
Analysis & Way Forward
- With over 8 lakh Waqf properties in India, any change must be well-calibrated and consultative.
- Ensuring legal clarity on terms like “Waqf-by-user” is vital to avoid misuse while upholding historical claims.
- The court's caution reflects a larger commitment to constitutional morality and rule of law in religious property management.
Mains Mock Question:
“Reforms in religious trust management must balance administrative inclusivity with protection of historical rights. Examine in the context of the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 and the Supreme Court’s intervention.”