- Despite schemes like POSHAN Abhiyaan, nutrition inequality persists for women and girls in India.
- NFHS-5 data: 57% women (15–49 yrs) anaemic vs 26% men; nearly 1 in 5 women underweight.
- In FY 2022–23, only 69% of POSHAN funds were utilised.
- Women's lack of economic and decision-making power leads to poor nutritional outcomes.
- Empowerment and financial independence strongly linked to improved nutrition.
- 5% of working women have salaried jobs; majority are in informal or insecure employment.
Detailed Insights:
- Gendered malnutrition: Cultural norms and food hierarchy push women’s needs last; nutrition is a social justice issue, not just biomedical.
- POSHAN Abhiyaan: Aims to improve nutrition among women and children but fails due to structural and empowerment gaps.
- Underutilisation of funds and weak targeting mean that awareness alone isn’t enough—women must have the means to access nutritious food.
- Empirical evidence (e.g., Esther Duflo’s studies) shows women spend more on nutrition when they control income.
- Employment without decision-making power doesn’t translate into better nutrition or health.
- POSHAN 2.0 must integrate livelihoods and ensure cross-sectoral coordination to be effective.
Key Concepts:
- Nutritional Inequality: Disparities in food access and health outcomes based on gender and social status.
- Empowerment-Nutrition Link: Financial control and autonomy lead to better dietary decisions for women.
- Siloed Governance: Lack of coordination among departments (health, nutrition, livelihoods) reduces impact.
Significance:
- Highlights the intersection of gender, economics, and nutrition.
- Underscores need to converge welfare schemes with women’s empowerment and income-generation efforts.
- Moves the conversation beyond food access to dignity, autonomy, and structural transformation.
- A model for holistic human development, especially in undernourished districts.
Mains Mock Question:
“Despite large-scale nutritional programmes like POSHAN Abhiyaan, undernutrition among women persists. Analyse the structural and socio-economic factors behind this trend and suggest policy-level reforms to address them.”