GS 3: Environment & EcologyGS 2: GovernanceGS 1: Indian Society

Contesting the future of forest governance, Pg7

The Chhattisgarh forest department’s attempt to assume control over Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR) under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006 triggered public protests and raised serious concerns about the autonomy of gram sabhas in forest governance.

Practice MCQs

876 Students attempted
Attempt Now

Key Highlights:

  • The Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006 recognises gram sabhas as the legal authority for managing community forest resources (CFRs).
  • Chhattisgarh forest department issued a letter in 2025 declaring itself as the nodal agency for CFRR implementation — a move contrary to FRA provisions.
  • The letter enforced a model plan from the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) and barred NGOs and other departments from aiding gram sabhas — violating decentralised rights.
  • Due to grassroots mobilisation, the letter was withdrawn, but it reflects an ongoing institutional conflict between state forest departments and local communities.

Critical Issues Raised:

  • Colonial legacy of forest management continues through state forest departments, prioritising timber extraction under the garb of “scientific forestry”.
  • Working Plans remain the dominant tool, excluding ecological diversity and livelihood needs of forest dwellers.
  • Only ~1,000 out of 10,000 CFRR-holding gram sabhas have prepared CFR management plans — largely due to lack of departmental cooperation.
  • Forest departments obstruct CFR implementation by rejecting claims, withholding funds, and delegitimising gram sabhas.
  • MoTA has vacillated in its policy stand — initially supportive in 2015 but later aligned with the Environment Ministry to insist on NWPC compliance, diluting the FRA’s intent.

Way Forward:

  • MoTA must reaffirm gram sabha autonomy and formally disallow NWPC imposition on CFR plans.
  • The Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan offers a flexible and iterative planning framework that can be adapted by gram sabhas.
  • Forest departments must: Stop obstructing CFR claims and provide technical support and funding.
  • Encourage local innovations, recognise lived forest knowledge, and institutionalise co-governance models between communities and the state.

Key Concepts Involved:

  • Forest Rights Act (2006): Recognises the historical rights of forest-dwelling communities; empowers gram sabhas to manage forests.
  • Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR): Rights to protect, regenerate, conserve, or manage community forest resources under Section 3(1)(i) of the FRA.
  • National Working Plan Code (NWPC): A guideline for preparing working plans, largely oriented towards timber-centric and data-heavy forest management.
  • Scientific Forestry: A colonial paradigm aimed at maximising timber yield, often ignoring ecological diversity and indigenous practices.
SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited