Governors' actions in Tamil Nadu and Kerala spark controversy, challenging Supreme Court directives and raising questions about their role in state universities.
The Supreme Court has censured the Tamil Nadu Governor for obstructing bills passed by the state legislature.
Governor R.N. Ravi referred the Kalaignar University Bill to the President instead of assenting to it.
Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar directed state-run universities to observe a ‘Partition horrors day’ on August 14.
State-owned universities have become a major point of conflict between Governors and State governments.
Detailed Insights:
The office of the Governor was originally a colonial mechanism to control provinces, with Governors serving as Chancellors of universities to ensure autonomy and prestige.
Early Indian leaders retained the Governor as a central appointee to guard against separatist tendencies.
Draft UGC regulations seek to give Chancellors greater power in the selection of Vice-Chancellors, potentially reducing the role of State governments.
The National Education Policy 2020 emphasizes greater autonomy for educational institutions, requiring university heads to manage finances and fundraising.
Some argue that professionals should replace Governors as both ceremonial and executive heads of universities.
The Supreme Court specified timelines for the Governor’s response to Bills and declared any Presidential intervention based on the Governor’s recommendation as invalid.
In many states, legislation retained the role of Governors as Chancellors of state-run universities to give them a colonial aura.
Key Concepts Involved:
Governor: The appointed head of a state, acting as a representative of the central government.
Chancellor: The ceremonial head of a university, often the Governor of the state.
National Education Policy 2020: A policy framework to transform the education system in India.