GS 2: PolityGS 2: GovernanceEthics

Can lawyers break client confidentiality?, Pg10

Supreme Court upholds attorney-client privilege, safeguarding fair trial and constitutional rights against state intrusion, reinforcing justice system integrity.

Practice MCQs

883 Students attempted
Attempt Now

Key Highlights:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the crucial role of advocates in a constitutional democracy on October 31.
  • A lawyer cannot be summoned to disclose client communications unless the legal advice was used to commit or conceal a crime.
  • The ruling arose from a notice issued to an advocate under Section 179 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).
  • The court linked the protection under Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) to Article 20(3), guaranteeing against self-incrimination.

Detailed Insights:

  • Privileged communications protect certain relationships like attorney-client and spousal, shielding confidential exchanges from disclosure to promote honesty, trust, and ethical responsibility.
  • Section 128 of the BSA protects marital communications, while Section 129 bars the release of unpublished official records related to state affairs to safeguard national interest.
  • Section 132 of the BSA prohibits advocates from revealing professional communications, with exceptions for client consent, illegal purposes, or observed criminal activity.
  • The judgment constitutionalises the privilege by linking Section 132’s protection to Article 20(3)’s guarantee against self-incrimination, preventing the state from coercing lawyers to disclose confidential communication.
  • The Supreme Court positions the advocate as a ‘constitutional actor’, essential to the constitutional architecture of legal representation, safeguarding citizens and ensuring no prejudice is caused to the accused.
  • The ruling strengthens the right to effective legal representation under Article 21 and Article 22(1), reminding that investigative power is not unbounded and stops at the lawyer’s door when ‘professional confidence’ is at stake.

Key Concepts Involved:

  • Privileged Communication: Confidential exchanges protected by law to maintain trust and honesty.
  • Self-incrimination: The act of exposing oneself to prosecution by being forced to testify against oneself.
  • Rule of Law: The principle that all people are subject to and accountable to the law.
SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited