Practice MCQs
Despite being frontline participants in environmental justice movements, women remain excluded from decision-making processes.
Laws such as India’s Forest Rights Act (2006) and PESA (1996) provide for women’s land rights, but implementation is weak and gender-insensitive.
Customary laws and patriarchal practices still dominate land distribution and ownership in South Asia.
FPIC (Free, Prior and Informed Consent) frameworks rarely reflect genuine gender inclusion.
Women across India, from Tamil Nadu’s coastlines to Odisha’s forests and Jharkhand’s mining zones, lead resistance against extractive projects, yet their voices are ignored in formal consultations.
In many cases, land titles are in male names, single or widowed women are excluded, and women-headed households are left out of compensation processes.
Displacement, environmental degradation, and climate change deepen existing gender inequities—impacting women’s access to forests, water, fuel, and livelihoods.
In Bangladesh and Nepal, similar patterns persist, despite progressive legal provisions for land rights and co-ownership.
FPIC (Free, Prior and Informed Consent): A legal principle in international law that ensures communities (especially Indigenous) have the right to give or withhold consent to projects affecting their land and livelihoods.
Climate Adaptation Frameworks: Often fail to integrate traditional ecological knowledge and gender-sensitive planning, which limits their effectiveness.
Without women’s leadership and participation, policies on land, environment, and climate lack legitimacy and effectiveness.
The intersection of gender and climate injustice highlights the need for inclusive planning that recognizes women not just as victims but as leaders and knowledge holders.
Mains Mock Question:
“Women are central to environmental resistance but marginal in decision-making. Critically examine the gendered dimensions of environmental governance in India.”