The Supreme Court will hear a petition regarding the use of Generative AI (GenAI) in judicial work after two weeks.
The petition raises concerns about GenAI potentially creating fictitious judgments and perpetuating bias.
Advocate Kartikeya Rawal is requesting the court to establish guidelines for the use of GenAI in courts.
The petition highlights potential constitutional and human rights concerns due to the use of AI in the judicial system.
Detailed Insights:
The petition emphasizes that GenAI's ability to generate new data and automate processes could lead to "hallucinations," resulting in fake case laws and biased information.
The unregulated use of AI and Machine Learning in the judicial system could compromise data integrity and transparency, raising concerns about stakeholder liability.
GenAI's capacity to produce original content and answer questions could also replicate and amplify existing biases and discriminatory practices.
The Chief Justice of India acknowledged the court's awareness of the impact of AI on judicial functions.
Key Concepts Involved:
Generative AI (GenAI): A type of artificial intelligence that can generate new content, such as text, images, and code.
Machine Learning: A type of artificial intelligence that allows computer systems to learn from data without being explicitly programmed.
Hallucinations: In the context of AI, refers to the generation of false or misleading information by the AI model.