The Supreme Court questioned the Election Commission (EC) regarding voter details added to the final Bihar electoral roll after a special intensive revision (SIR).
Over 21.5 lakh voters were added to the final roll, while 3.66 lakh were removed.
The final list shows 7.42 crore eligible voters in Bihar, higher than the 7.24 crore in the draft roll.
The court inquired whether the 3.66 lakh deleted voters were individually informed of their exclusion and if a separate list was accessible at the grassroots level.
Detailed Insights:
The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of transparency and access to information in an open democracy, questioning the EC about the identity of newly added voters.
The court raised concerns about a potential mismatch between the official estimate of the adult population in Bihar (8.22 crore) and the number of electors in the final rolls (7.42 crore).
Allegations were made that the SIR exercise disproportionately excluded women and Muslims from the electoral rolls, with claims of 17 lakh missing women and a reduction of about six lakh Muslim voters.
The petitioners argued that the SIR exercise has compounded problems due to the EC's opacity, leading to a sharp fall in the adult population to electors' ratio.
Key Concepts Involved:
Electoral Roll: A list of persons registered to vote in an election.
Special Intensive Revision (SIR): A process of updating and revising the electoral roll to ensure accuracy and inclusivity.
Transparency: The principle that government business should be open to public knowledge and scrutiny.