Practice MCQs
Indian armed forces conducted 24 precision strikes on terror training camps in Pakistan and PoK under Operation Sindoor.
Action spanned 9 sites, completed within 25 minutes, without harming civilians.
Defence Minister cited this as India exercising its right to respond post-Pahalgam terror attack.
Air defence on high alert anticipating Pakistani retaliation.
Pakistan responded with heavy shelling, killing 12 civilians and one soldier in J&K.
Objective: Targets included camps and infrastructure used to train terrorists, not civilian areas, aimed at breaking terrorist morale.
Range of Targets: Spread across Pakistan and PoK; strike distances varied from 6 km to 100 km.
Strategic Communication: Defence Ministry emphasized "precision, precaution, and compassion" to avoid civilian casualties.
Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri: Emphasized the operation was measured, proportionate, and responsible.
Political Statement: India reaffirmed that those behind Pahalgam attack will be held accountable.
Pakistan’s Counterclaim: Reported 31 deaths and 57 injuries, accusing India of civilian targeting—denied by India.
Precision Strike: Military attack targeting specific enemy facilities or positions with minimal collateral damage.
Air Defence Alert: Military posture involving deployment and readiness of anti-air systems to deter or respond to aerial threats.
Demonstrates India’s capability and intent to act decisively against cross-border terrorism.
Reinforces shift from passive diplomacy to proactive deterrence in India's security doctrine.
May reshape India-Pakistan bilateral dynamics, especially under nuclear deterrence.
Highlights India's calibrated use of military power within international legal and humanitarian frameworks.
Mains Mock Question:
Discuss the strategic and diplomatic implications of precision military strikes across the border in the context of India's evolving counter-terrorism policy. How do such actions align with principles of proportionality and state responsibility under international law?