Supreme Court examines surrogacy law's restriction on couples facing secondary infertility, questioning reproductive rights and legality of the Surrogacy Act.
The Supreme Court is examining the legality of restricting surrogacy for couples facing secondary infertility seeking a second child.
Under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, surrogacy is generally permitted only for couples without any surviving child, with exceptions for children with disabilities or life-threatening disorders.
The petitioners argued that the state cannot interfere in citizens' private lives and reproductive choices.
The government argued that surrogacy is not a fundamental right and involves the use of another woman's body.
Detailed Insights:
Secondary infertility is the inability to conceive or carry a pregnancy to term after previously having children, with causes similar to primary infertility like Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, endometriosis, and lifestyle factors.
The court previously diluted age specifications for surrogacy, allowing relaxation for couples who had frozen embryos before the Act's passage.
Restrictions differentiating between primary and secondary infertility may be seen as overly restrictive if the law's intent is to prevent commercial surrogacy and exploitation.
Currently, India has no law restricting the number of children a person can have, though many states incentivize a two-child norm through government benefits.
An expansive interpretation of the law could assist intending parents and prevent commercial surrogacy.
Key Concepts Involved:
Surrogacy: An arrangement where a woman carries and delivers a child for another person or couple.
Infertility: The inability to conceive after one year of unprotected intercourse.
Fundamental Right: A basic right guaranteed by the Constitution, which cannot be easily taken away by law.