Practice MCQs
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 was enacted to streamline corporate insolvency processes with a time-bound mechanism (330 days max).
As of 2024, ?3.89 lakh crore recovered with an average recovery rate of 32.8%, exceeding the average liquidation value.
IBC accounted for 48% of bank recoveries in FY 202324, per RBI data.
93.4% of fair value of distressed assets has been realised through resolution plans.
Over 30,000 cases settled pre-admission, indicating a behavioural shift in borrowers.
NPAs fell from 11.2% (2018) to 2.8% (2024), partly due to IBC impact.
Detailed Insights
Why IBC was Needed:
India lacked a unified insolvency law before 2016.
Previous recovery frameworks (DRTs, SARFAESI) were time-consuming and ineffective.
IBC shifted control from debtors to creditors, ensuring accountability and timely action.
Positive Impacts:
Significantly improved credit culture; defaults are no longer safe zones.
Encouraged pre-emptive settlements by defaulters.
Enhanced corporate governance more independent directors onboard.
Systemic Challenges:
NCLT delays hamper timely resolutions.
Legal framework lacks clarity on non-traditional assets like IP, tech continuity.
Bhushan Steel SC verdict re-opened a closed resolution, shaking trust in IBC finality.
Need for Reform:
Strengthen tribunal infrastructure.
Introduce pre-pack insolvency for quicker resolution, especially for MSMEs.
Clarify jurisprudence to protect bona fide commercial decisions post-resolution.
Scientific/Technical Concepts Involved
Insolvency: A state where an entity is unable to repay debts on time.
Liquidation Value: The amount expected from selling the company's assets if it were to shut down.
Pre-Packaged Insolvency: A negotiated insolvency plan between creditors and debtors before formal NCLT proceedings.
Mains Mock Question:
Q. _The IBC has transformed Indias insolvency landscape but still faces implementation and legal predictability challenges. Critically examine_.