How ‘bulldozer justice’ undermines the law, Pg9

Key Highlights:

• The article discusses the increasing acceptance of "bulldozer justice" in India, where state authorities demolish properties of alleged offenders.
• It highlights that while the use of bulldozers by the state is not new, its current amplification as a symbol of state firmness is concerning.

Detailed Insights:

• The concept of using bulldozers as a tool of state policy dates back to the Emergency in 1976, but its perception has shifted from being viewed as an excess to being seen as a sign of governmental resolve.
• The pressure for "instant justice" is fueled by a massive backlog of over 5.5 crore cases in Indian courts and a shortage of judges, with only 15 judges per million people as opposed to the Law Commission's recommendation of 50.
• "Bulldozer justice" raises questions about why illegal structures were allowed in the first place, suggesting systemic corruption or negligence on the part of law enforcers.
• The practice of demolishing homes before completing investigations blurs the line between punishment and extrajudicial action, undermining the principles of a constitutional democracy.
• The article advocates for strengthening institutions by expanding judicial capacity, filling vacancies, modernizing court infrastructure, and improving investigative processes to address delays in the justice system.

Key Concepts Involved:

• Rule of Law: The principle that all people are subject to and accountable to the law, which is fairly applied and enforced.
• Due Process: Legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to a person.
• Extrajudicial Action: Actions taken outside the authority of the law.