The Supreme Court ruled that police must issue a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) before arresting individuals accused of offenses punishable with imprisonment up to seven years.
The court emphasized that arrest is not mandatory but a discretionary power to facilitate investigation and evidence collection.
A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N K Singh delivered the order in response to an appeal challenging a July 1, 2021, judgment of the Allahabad High Court.
The order, dated January 15, clarifies that a Section 35(3) notice is the rule, while arrest under Section 35(6) read with Section 35(1)(b) of the BNSS, 2023, is an exception.
Detailed Insights:
The Supreme Court highlighted that Section 35(6) of the BNSS, 2023 was introduced considering Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty.
Section 35(1)(b) outlines the conditions under which a police officer can make arrests without a warrant in cases involving imprisonment of less than seven years.
Section 35(6) pertains to arrests when a person fails to comply with the terms of a notice or refuses to identify themselves.
The court clarified that even when arrest conditions under Section 35(1)(b) of the BNSS, 2023 are met, an arrest should only occur when absolutely necessary, urging police officers to exercise caution.
The ruling reinforces safeguards to protect individual rights, ensuring arrests are not made arbitrarily for offenses with imprisonment up to seven years.
Key Concepts Involved:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS): A law that outlines procedures for criminal investigation and prosecution in India.
Article 21 of the Constitution: Guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty to every individual.
Arrest: The act of legally detaining someone, restricting their freedom of movement.