The Supreme Court denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam on Monday in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots case under the UAPA.
The court cited evidence attributing a "central and formative role" to them in orchestrating the violence.
Conditional bail was granted to five other co-accused: Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa-ur-Rehman, Mohd. Saleem Khan, and Shadab Ahmed.
The court differentiated their roles as "subsidiary or facilitative," warranting different treatment.
Detailed Insights:
The court emphasized the need to assess the "hierarchy of participation" in the alleged offense, rejecting the idea of treating all accused equally.
The ruling stated that delays alone do not override the UAPA, enacted by Parliament for special category offenses.
The court observed that the prosecution was ready to commence arguments, but the accused raised objections and deferment requests.
While acknowledging "constitutional concern" due to prolonged pre-trial custody, the court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.
The court clarified that the UAPA extends to conduct destabilizing civic life, even without immediate physical violence.
The five co-accused were released on bail with conditions, including a bond of ₹2 lakh, sureties, and restrictions on leaving Delhi or making public statements about the case.
Key Concepts Involved:
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA): An anti-terror law that aims to prevent unlawful activities directed against the integrity and sovereignty of India.
Bail: The temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial, often with conditions attached.
Criminal Adjudication: The legal process of resolving criminal cases through investigation, trial, and sentencing.