Nicobar port has no ‘strategic goals’, govt. body said in 2024, Pg1
Finance Ministry's PIB found no strategic goals for Great Nicobar Port in 2024, contradicting Defence Ministry's later 'strategic project' declaration, raising transparency and environmental concerns.
The Public Investment Board (PIB), a Finance Ministry body, stated in August 2024 that the proposed International Container Transhipment Port (ICTP) at Galathea Bay, Great Nicobar Island, lacked "strategic objectives".
Despite this assessment, the Ministry of Defence formally designated the ₹81,000-crore Great Nicobar Project as "strategic" by March 2026.
The Public-Private Partnership Appraisal Committee (PPPAC) approved the ICTP proposal but declined the request for ₹12,230 crore in Viability Gap Funding (VGF).
The project's "strategic" nature has been cited since 2022 to withhold a High Powered Committee (HPC) report on environmental impact and deny Right To Information (RTI) requests.
The ICTP aims to attract transhipment cargo, with government estimates projecting annual foreign exchange savings of approximately $200 million.
Detailed Insights:
The comprehensive Great Nicobar Project includes the ICTP, a township, an airport, a gas-powered power plant, and a tourism zone.
The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways (MoPSW) was initially advised by the PIB to strengthen the strategic case for the port.
The formal notification of the project as "strategic" by the Ministry of Defence occurred over a year after the PIB's initial assessment.
The PPPAC, another Finance Ministry body, is responsible for vetting large public-private partnership proposals.
The Kamarajar Port Limited (KPL) in Chennai is the implementing agency for the port, while the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corporation Limited (ANIIDCO) is the overall project proponent.
Critics, including Congress MP Jairam Ramesh, argue that the project is predominantly a commercial venture despite the recent emphasis on its strategic importance.
Early project documents from 2021 and the 2023 Expression of Interest primarily highlighted economic benefits such as foreign exchange savings.
The project is now being promoted under a maritime security narrative, positioning it as a counterweight to Chinese naval expansion in the Indian Ocean.
Concerns persist regarding the environmental impact, with a High Powered Committee (HPC) report on cumulative effects not yet made public.
Former military officials have questioned the strategic rationale, advocating for a clear maritime doctrine and considering the ecological damage.
Key Concepts Involved:
Public Investment Board (PIB): A Finance Ministry body that appraises large public investment proposals by government ministries and public sector undertakings.
Public-Private Partnership Appraisal Committee (PPPAC): A Finance Ministry committee tasked with vetting project proposals exceeding ₹500 crore that involve private sector participation.
Viability Gap Funding (VGF): A one-time grant provided by the government to support infrastructure projects that are economically justified but lack commercial viability.
International Container Transhipment Port (ICTP): A port designed to facilitate the transfer of cargo containers between different ships, often for onward journeys.