Practice MCQs
Key Highlights
Supreme Court Verdict on Crackers Ban
The SC confirmed a complete ban on sale, production, and manufacture of firecrackers in Delhi-NCR, terming it "absolutely necessary".
Rejected pleas to limit the ban to 3–4 months/year, stating crackers would be stored and misused during prohibited periods.
Rationale for Ban
Cited “horrible” levels of air pollution in the region.
Continuous violation of earlier orders and reports confirming the high pollution load from crackers.
Noted air pollution disproportionately affects street workers and those unable to afford air purifiers.
Green Crackers: Conditional Review
SC acknowledged that ‘green crackers’ emit 30% less pollutants, but required scientific proof of minimum pollution levels.
If proven, the court may rethink earlier bans.
Right to Clean Air & Public Health
Reiterated Right to Clean Air as part of Right to Health under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Emphasised the responsibility of the State to protect this right, especially for vulnerable groups.
Implementation Directions
Directed Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan to ban online sale of crackers, file compliance in 2 weeks.
Ordered NCR States to set up effective machinery to monitor compliance, violators, and ensure enforcement.
Asked States to place public records of actions taken on official websites.
India-specific Angle
Delhi-NCR is one of the world’s most polluted regions; SC’s firm stance reaffirms judiciary’s commitment to environmental justice.
Brings focus on balancing economic interests of manufacturers with health and sustainability priorities.
Mains Mock Question:
"Discuss the role of judiciary in enforcing environmental rights in India with reference to recent rulings on firecracker bans. How can judicial activism align with sustainable development goals?"