SC seeks regulatory steps against ‘vulgarity’ online, Pg 1 & 10

Key Highlights

Supreme Court’s Stand on Online Content Regulation

• SC directed the Centre to suggest regulatory measures to curb the use of filthy language and vulgarity in online content.
• Bench led by Justice Surya Kant emphasized the difference between humour and perversity.

Need for Regulation Without Censorship

• Court clarified that measures should adhere to "well-known moral standards" of Indian society.
• Regulation should not infringe upon fundamental rights of free speech & expression but ensure decency and morality.

Case Background: Ranveer Allahbadia’s Ban

• YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia was barred from broadcasting after criminal cases in Maharashtra & Assam for comments in his show "India Got Talent".
• Allahbadia’s lawyer argued that the ban affected his livelihood and 280 employees.
• Court modified its previous order, allowing Allahbadia to resume "The Ranveer Show" provided he maintains decency & morality in content.

Government’s Perspective

• Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta stressed that vulgarity should not be confused with humour and must be regulated.
• Advocated for a "healthy debate" on content regulation with inputs from stakeholders.

Analysis & Way Forward

• Balancing free speech and moral standards is crucial in digital platforms.
• A self-regulation model with oversight mechanisms (similar to OTT guidelines) could ensure responsible content creation.
• Courts must avoid broad bans and instead set clear definitions to prevent misuse of regulation.

Mains Mock Question:

"Discuss the challenges in regulating digital content while ensuring the right to free speech. Suggest measures to balance ethical standards and creative freedom."