Speaker cannot be indecisive on pleas over defection: SC, Pg 1

• Supreme Court observed that Speakers cannot indefinitely delay decisions on disqualification pleas under the Tenth Schedule.

  • A constitutional court can direct a Speaker to act within a reasonable period, though not dictate the decision itself.

• Case relates to 10 BRS MLAs who defected in Telangana.

  • Bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai emphasized the need to preserve the spirit of the anti-defection law.

• Constitution does not specify exact timelines for decision on disqualification.

  • SC stressed that judicial inaction would render courts powerless if Speakers remained indecisive.

• Petitioners: Delay defeats the law's purpose.

  • Respondents: Speakers decision cannot be time-bound by courts.

• SC's stance reinforces the checks and balances needed for fair legislative conduct.

  • Calls for statutory timelines to prevent misuse of Speakers discretion.

Mains Mock Question:

"Critically evaluate the role of the Speaker under the Tenth Schedule. Should courts have the power to direct timely decisions on disqualification petitions?"