Practice MCQs
Key Highlights
Supreme Court Ruling
SC ruled the 2021 demolition of six houses in Prayagraj by the development authority as "inhumane and illegal".
Ordered ₹10 lakh compensation per house for violating the fundamental right to shelter.
The court emphasized that ‘rule of law still exists’ and must not be bypassed.
Violation of Due Process
Authorities issued show-cause notices and demolition orders on the same day (Dec 18, 2020), violating due process.
Homes were demolished without giving time to appeal.
Justice Oka stressed that right to shelter and fair hearing are integral to Article 21.
Political & Social Reaction
Opposition parties, including SP and Congress, criticized the act as "bulldozer justice" and a violation of dignity.
Emotional trauma of victims highlighted; damage to sentiments and social security cited.
Analysis & Way Forward
The judgment reinforces that executive actions must comply with constitutional safeguards.
Urgent need to regulate demolition protocols and ensure legal remedies are accessible before state action.
Authorities must uphold procedural fairness and human dignity in all eviction or demolition drives.
Mains Mock Question:
"How does the Supreme Court's intervention in cases of illegal demolitions uphold constitutional morality and the rule of law? Examine with reference to the right to shelter under Article 21."