GS 2: GovernanceGS 2: PolityPrelimsGS 2: Indian Constitutional Evolution, Features, Amendments, Basic Structure DoctrineGS 2: Separation of Powers and Dispute Redressal Mechanisms
Lessons on the right to assembly, Pg7
Delhi protests spark debate over constitutional right to assembly, as government's heavy-handed response and use of preventive laws like BNSS Section 163 draw criticism.
Protests erupted in Delhi against the Central government following large-scale voter exclusion in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).
Protesters demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
The government responded with heavy deployment of police and military personnel, raising concerns about protest suppression.
The issue highlights the constitutional right to assembly and expression versus state authority.
Detailed Insights:
The right to dissent and protest is fundamental to a liberal democracy, with a rich legacy in India.
A "culture of suspicion" towards protests, questioning permissions and funding, is emerging, viewing citizens as passive recipients.
Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech and expression, while Article 19(1)(b) ensures the right to assemble peaceably without arms.
Restrictions on assembly must adhere to Article 19(3), allowing reasonable restrictions in the interest of sovereignty, integrity, or public order.
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, specifically Section 163, is criticized for granting wide discretion to the executive to prevent public disturbance.
The Supreme Court in Himmat Lal vs Commissioner of Police (1972) distinguished reasonable regulation from arbitrary exclusion of assembly.
The denotification of Jantar Mantar as a protest site is seen as undermining the right to assembly by moving protests to inaccessible areas.
The Supreme Court directed the designation of "suitable alternative sites" for protest when hearing petitions challenging a blanket transport ban to Delhi.
Key Concepts Involved:
Right to Assembly: A fundamental right under Article 19(1)(b) allowing citizens to gather peaceably without arms.
Reasonable Restrictions: Limitations imposed by the state on fundamental rights under Article 19(3) in the interest of public order, sovereignty, or integrity.
Chilling Effect: The suppression of legitimate exercise of rights due to fear of legal sanctions or government reprisal.