OBC creamy-layer criteria: SC likely to set up special Bench, Pg1
Supreme Court to consider special bench on OBC creamy layer criteria for civil services, addressing Centre's plea on retrospective implementation and seniority impact.
The Supreme Court will consider forming a special Bench to clarify its March 11 judgment on OBC creamy-layer criteria.
The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) seeks guidance on the retrospective application of the judgment for the 2025 civil services exam.
The March 11 ruling in Union of India v. Rohith Nathan mandated supernumerary posts for OBC candidates excluded due to parental salaries.
The Centre warned that retrospective implementation could cause a "cascading effect" on settled service matters since 2012.
Detailed Insights:
The DoPT aims to proceed with service allocation for 958 candidates based on pre-March 11 wealth/income test criteria.
The judgment clarified the "income/wealth test" component of the creamy layer exclusion framework for OBCs in public employment.
The court identified "hostile discrimination" where parental salary was included for non-government employees but excluded for government servants in the income test.
Supernumerary posts are intended to accommodate affected OBC candidates without disrupting existing selections or seniority.
The Centre argued that the decision, if applied retrospectively, could significantly alter seniority, promotion, and cadre placement.
Key Concepts Involved:
OBC Creamy Layer: An income-based criterion to exclude affluent individuals from Other Backward Classes from reservation benefits.
Supernumerary Posts: Additional posts created beyond the sanctioned strength to accommodate specific categories of employees.
Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT): The central agency responsible for recruitment, training, and service conditions of civil servants in India.
Union Public Service Commission (UPSC): India's central recruiting agency conducting examinations for various civil services.