UGC equity rules being reconsidered: Centre to SC, Pg5

Supreme Court stays UGC equity rules on caste discrimination, prompting Centre to reconsider regulations amidst political and social backlash.

Practice MCQs

746 Students attempted
Attempt Now

Key Highlights:

  • The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is reconsidering the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026.
  • These regulations, notified on January 13, 2026, were stayed by the Supreme Court on January 29, 2026.
  • The Supreme Court's stay was prompted by challenges to Regulation 3(1)(c), which defines caste-based discrimination, with petitioners arguing it excluded general category students.
  • The Court directed that the UGC (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2012, would continue to remain in force until further orders.
  • The issue has garnered significant political attention and objections from various community groups.

Detailed Insights:

  • The 2026 Regulations were designed to establish robust institutional mechanisms to prevent caste discrimination in higher education.
  • Their formulation followed a 2019 Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the mothers of Payal Tadvi and Rohith Vemula, seeking stronger anti-discrimination measures after their children's alleged suicides due to caste discrimination.
  • Regulation 3(1)(c) specifically defined caste-based discrimination as that against members of Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
  • The Supreme Court deemed the 2026 Regulations "prima facie vague" and "capable of misuse," expressing concerns about "sweeping consequences" and the potential to "divide society."
  • The 2012 Regulations, now revived, broadly prohibited discrimination based on caste, creed, religion, and mandated institutions to promote equality and establish equal opportunity cells.
  • The 2026 Regulations had proposed new mandates such as the establishment of Anti-discrimination cells, appointment of Equity Officers, and formation of Equity Committees for grievance redressal.
  • The Supreme Court questioned the regulations' scope, their impact on existing constitutional classifications, the concept of "separate yet equal," and the omission of "Ragging" as a specific form of discrimination.

Key Concepts Involved:

  • UGC (University Grants Commission): A statutory body responsible for the coordination, determination, and maintenance of standards of university education in India.
  • Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), Other Backward Classes (OBCs): Constitutionally recognized categories of socially and educationally disadvantaged groups in India, eligible for affirmative action policies.
  • Caste-based discrimination: Any form of prejudice, exclusion, or unfair treatment directed at individuals or groups based on their caste identity.
  • Article 142 of the Constitution: Grants the Supreme Court discretionary power to pass any decree or order necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it.
Previous
1/9Next
SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited