Factor in terror act 'hierarchy' defined by SC in 2020 riots case, HC tells litigants, Pg8

Key Highlights:

• The Delhi High Court advised considering the Supreme Court's expanded definition of a terrorist act in the 2023 Parliament security breach case.
• The Supreme Court's January 5th judgement in the 2020 Delhi riots case created a hierarchy of offenders under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
• Accused in the Parliament security breach case, Manoranjan D, Lalit Jha, and Sagar Sharma, face charges under UAPA for a coordinated gas attack on December 13, 2023.
• The High Court will continue hearing the bail pleas of the three accused on February 2.

Detailed Insights:

• The Supreme Court's ruling broadened the definition of a terrorist act under UAPA, stating that the means are not limited to conventional weapons.
• The Delhi High Court questioned the accused about their choice of December 13th, the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror attack, for the protest.
• Previously, the High Court granted bail to Neelam Ranolia and Mahesh Kumawat, noting their protest was symbolic and didn't constitute a terrorist act under UAPA.
• Manoranjan D and Sagar Sharma allegedly opened smoke canisters inside Parliament, while Lalit Jha is accused of destroying evidence related to the conspiracy.

Key Concepts Involved:

• Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA): Indian law aimed at preventing unlawful activities and addressing terrorism.
• Terrorist Act: As defined under UAPA, it includes acts intended to threaten the unity, integrity, security, or sovereignty of India.
• Bail: The temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial, often under specific conditions.