Right to be forgotten: Apex court to examine if it applies to online news, Pg9

Key Highlights:

• The Supreme Court is examining whether the "right to be forgotten" (RTBF) applies to online news reports, particularly after an accused is discharged.
• The case involves a banker who sought the removal of news reports after being discharged in a money laundering investigation.
• The Delhi High Court had previously ordered the removal of certain URLs, citing the individual's right to dignity and reputation under Article 21.
• The Indian Express is challenging the High Court's decision, arguing it sets a "dangerous precedent" that could suppress factual reporting.

Detailed Insights:

• The dispute originated from a defamation suit filed by a banker seeking the removal of three news reports published between 2020 and 2024.
• These reports were based on public records, including Enforcement Directorate (ED) press releases and court proceedings, and were accurate when published.
• The Patiala House court initially granted an interim injunction in November 2025, ordering the removal of the URLs, citing potential harm to the banker's reputation.
• The petitioner argues that the High Court's order could lead to the concealment of matters of public record and public interest, distorting history and creating a chilling effect on the freedom of the press.
• The Supreme Court has stayed the Delhi High Court judgment, clarifying that the order will not operate as a precedent, and has listed the matter for further hearing on March 16.
• The "right to be forgotten" is considered a facet of the Right to Privacy and the Right to Life and Dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Key Concepts Involved:

• Right to be Forgotten (RTBF): The right to have personal information removed from internet searches and other directories.
• Article 21: A fundamental right in the Indian Constitution guaranteeing the right to life and personal liberty.
• Defamation: The act of harming the reputation of someone by making false statements.