Q3. There is also a point of view that Agricultural Produce Market Committees [APMCs) set up under the State Acts have not only impeded the development of agriculture but also have been the cause of food inflation in India. Critically examine.

Model Answer:

Introduction

Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs), established under state laws, were designed to ensure fair trade between farmers and buyers, stabilising prices and reducing exploitation. However, they are increasingly criticized for stifling agricultural growth and exacerbating food inflation.

Body

Role and Rationale of APMCs

APMCs were set up to protect farmers from exploitation by large buyers, especially in rural markets. Under APMC Acts, farmers can sell their produce only in designated APMC markets, theoretically ensuring fair prices through transparent bidding systems. However, this controlled approach has increasingly become counterproductive.

Criticisms of APMCs

1. Market Monopoly: APMCs often act as monopolies, concentrating market power with licensed agents. This restricts farmers from directly accessing buyers, resulting in limited price discovery and reducing the bargaining power of farmers.
2. Middlemen’s Role: Licensed intermediaries in APMC markets charge high commissions and fees, which farmers must pay regardless of the produce’s final price. This intermediary chain has led to higher transaction costs, inflating the final consumer prices.
3. Restricted Competition: APMCs restrict inter-state trade and discourage private investments in agricultural infrastructure, such as warehousing and cold chains, creating bottlenecks in efficient supply chain management.
4. Food Inflation: Due to inefficient market practices, including lack of infrastructure and high intermediation costs, APMCs contribute to supply-side inflation. Delays and costs within the system increase consumer prices without benefitting farmers.

Reforms and Recommendations

1. Model APMC Act: To address inefficiencies, the central government proposed a Model APMC Act in 2017, which encourages private market participation and removes restrictions on direct sales.
2. E-NAM: The National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) platform allows farmers to access a nationwide market, enabling price transparency and removing some traditional market restrictions.
3. Alternative Markets: States are encouraged to create alternative market structures, such as private mandis, to ensure competitive pricing and reduce monopolistic tendencies.

Conclusion‍

While APMCs initially aimed to empower farmers, their monopolistic practices have hampered agricultural growth and contributed to food inflation. Reforms to increase market competition and reduce intermediaries can modernize agriculture, benefiting both producers and consumers.

‍

Instant Mains Evaluation with SuperKalam

‍