Q5. The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 has come into effect from Ist January 2014. What are the key issues which would get addressed with the Act in place? What implications would it have on industrialization and agriculture in India?

Model Answer:

Introduction

The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement (LARR) Act, 2013, effective from January 1, 2014, aimed to safeguard the interests of landowners and affected communities during land acquisitions. While it introduced much-needed reforms, certain issues have limited its effectiveness and acceptance.

Body

Key Issues with the LARR Act, 2013

1. Complexity and Delays in Implementation: The Act’s procedural requirements, including mandatory Social Impact Assessments (SIA) and consent clauses (requiring consent from 70-80% of affected communities), often lead to extended delays. These delays discourage investment and pose challenges for projects aimed at infrastructure and development.
2. High Compensation Rates: While fair compensation is essential, the Act mandates compensation rates that are often two to four times the market value in rural areas. This can increase project costs substantially, potentially making projects financially unfeasible and discouraging private-sector participation.
3. Ambiguity in Consent Clauses: The requirement for obtaining consent from 70% of landowners for public-private partnerships (PPPs) and 80% for private projects creates ambiguities, particularly where there are multiple land titles or disputed claims. This often complicates negotiations, slowing down acquisition processes.
4. Rehabilitation and Resettlement Challenges: The Act emphasizes fair rehabilitation and resettlement, but implementation in this area has been inconsistent. Insufficient clarity on rehabilitation processes and gaps in execution have led to inadequate support for affected populations, often leaving them worse off than before.
5. Limited Scope for State Adaptations: The Act restricts states’ flexibility to modify provisions according to regional requirements, often leading to resistance from state governments. This has resulted in some states enacting their laws or proposing amendments, causing inconsistency in implementation across India.
6. Impact on Industrial Development: High compliance costs and lengthy acquisition procedures deter industrial growth and infrastructure development, leading to a decrease in investor confidence. Key infrastructure sectors such as roads, ports, and energy face significant challenges due to these procedural complexities. 

Implications for Industrialization and Agriculture

1. Industrialization: By ensuring fair compensation and transparency, the Act may lead to smoother acquisition processes, thus facilitating industrial projects. However, it may also increase costs for developers, potentially impacting the pace of industrial growth.
2. Agricultural Impact: The Act promotes sustainable agricultural practices by safeguarding farmers’ rights. Ensuring fair compensation and rehabilitation, it may encourage farmers to engage more actively in land negotiations rather than resist acquisition. 

Conclusion‍

While the LARR Act, of 2013, aimed to address land acquisition concerns through fair compensation and transparent procedures, its rigid requirements and high costs have limited its effectiveness. Addressing these issues is crucial to balancing landowner rights with economic development. 

‍

Instant Mains Evaluation with SuperKalam

‍