The ‘Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and its Members’ as envisaged in Article 105 of the Constitution leave room for a large number of uncodified and unenumerated privileges to continue. Assess the reasons for the absence of legal codification of the ‘parliamentary privileges’. How can this problem be addressed?
The ‘Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and its Members’ as envisaged in Article 105 of the Constitution leave room for a large number of uncodified and unenumerated privileges to continue. Assess the reasons for the absence of legal codification of the ‘parliamentary privileges’. How can this problem be addressed?
Parliamentary privileges remain largely uncodified under Article 105, creating ambiguity about their scope and application in contemporary democracy.
Reasons for Absence of Legal Codification
Historical and Constitutional Factors
- British Legacy: Inherited Westminster system where privileges evolved through conventions and precedents rather than statutory law
- Constitutional Design: Article 105 deliberately mirrors House of Commons privileges as they existed in 1950, maintaining flexibility
- Framers' Intent: Constitutional drafters preferred adaptable framework over rigid codification
- Judicial Recognition: Supreme Court acknowledged Parliament's inherent authority in determining privilege matters
- Democratic Precedence: Historical emphasis on parliamentary supremacy in Westminster democracies
Political and Practical Considerations
- Legislative Resistance: MPs' reluctance to limit their own powers through formal restrictions
- Political Consensus Gap: Lack of agreement across party lines on privilege boundaries
- Contextual Application: Need for Speaker's discretion in addressing varied situations
- Evolutionary Nature: Privileges continue adapting to modern democratic challenges
- Federal Dynamics: Complex interplay between Parliament and state legislatures regarding privilege scope
| Codified Approach | Uncodified Approach |
|---|---|
| Clear legal boundaries | Flexible interpretation |
| Judicial review possible | Parliamentary self-regulation |
| Limited adaptability | Evolutionary development |
| Reduced ambiguity | Contextual application |
Addressing the Problem
Legal and Institutional Framework
- Comprehensive Legislation: Draft Parliamentary Privileges Act defining clear scope and limitations
- Constitutional Amendment: Consider Article 105 modification for better clarity
- Judicial Safeguards: Establish clear court-Parliament jurisdiction boundaries
- Independent Oversight: Create autonomous body for privilege violation investigations
- Regular Review Mechanism: Periodic assessment of privilege relevance and application
Modern Reforms and Balance
- Accountability Integration: Balance legislative independence with fundamental rights protection
- Technology Adaptation: Address digital age challenges in privilege application
- International Best Practices: Study codified systems in Australia, Canada for lessons
- Transparency Measures: Public disclosure of privilege invocation and outcomes
- Training Programs: Regular sensitization for MPs on ethical privilege use
The Supreme Court's 2024 judgment excluding bribery from parliamentary privileges signals evolving jurisprudence. A balanced codification framework ensuring legislative autonomy while preventing privilege misuse represents the optimal path forward for strengthening parliamentary democracy.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
Indian Polity PYQs from 2014
- 12.5 MarksView Answer
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in India can be most effective when its tasks are adequately supported by other mechanisms that ensure the accountability of a government. In light of the above observation, assess the role of NHRC as an effective complement to the judiciary and other institutions in promoting and protecting human rights standards.
- 12.5 MarksView Answer
The setting up of a Rail Tariff Authority to regulate fares will subject the cash strapped Indian Railways to demand subsidy for the obligation to operate non-profitable routes and services. Taking into account the experience in the power sector, discuss if the proposed reform is expected to benefit the consumers, the Indian Railways or the private container operators.
- 12.5 MarksView Answer
The size of the cabinet should be as big as governmental work justifies and as big as the Prime Minister can manage as a team. How far is the efficacy of a government then inversely related to the size of the cabinet? Discuss.
- 12.5 MarksView Answer
Instances of the President's delay in commuting death sentences has come under public debate as denial of justice. Should there be a time specified for the President to accept/reject such petitions? Analyse
- 12.5 MarksView Answer
What do you understand about the concept “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do the films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.
- 12.5 MarksView Answer
Though the federal principle is dominant in our Constitution and that principle is one of its basic features, it is equally true that federalism under the Indian Constitution leans in favour of a strong Centre, a feature that militates against the concept of strong federalism.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
